Star Sydney Gambler Who Sued After Ban Has Case Tossed by Judge

Star Sydney Gambler Who Sued After Ban Has Case Tossed by Judge.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

Kim Nguyen won t have an opportunity to win back the money she blew at Australia s casino. She sued the Star Entertainment property in an attempt to have it lift a ban it placed on her, but a judge has thrown out the case.

Star SydneyStar Entertainment s Star Sydney casino in New South Wales, Australia. The casino recently won a small victory when a lawsuit it faced was dismissed. (Image: The Guardian)

Star Sydney , a beauty therapist, in April of last year. Initially, she didn t challenge the casino s decision. She later explained when she filed her lawsuit, she was dealing with family issues and COVID-19 at the time, and the lawsuit didn t seem like a priority.

However, Nguyen ultimately decided to attack since the ban was keeping her from being able to work as a travel host at the casino. Why she wanted to work there following her ban will always be a mystery.

Nguyen then filed a lawsuit with the Supreme Court of New South Wales. She hoped to force Star Sydney to lift the ban and allow her back on the gaming floor.

Nguyen alleged in her suit that the casino withdrew her VIP membership and implemented the ban with no explanation. She also accused it of making false statements to the police to support its decision.

No Dice on Ban Removal

In addition to removing the ban, Nguyen hoped to recover the AU$950,000 (US$659,600) she lost at the casino. This was on top of money belonging to her that she claimed Star Sydney kept. In her lawsuit, she stated that she had AU$2,500 (US$1,740) in VIP credit at the time of the ban, which the casino confiscated.

Removing the ban would have opened the possibility that she could work as a travel host. It would also have allowed her to return to the gaming floor to try to win back the money she lost.

However, a judge dismissed her suit this past Monday, explaining that Nguyen had no legal grounds to demand the lifting of the ban. The judge also stated that bans such as this don t fall under the purview of the courts.

While that verdict alone would be enough to disappoint her, Nguyen is now also stuck paying Star Sydney s legal costs. There s no indication of how much that may be.

Only a Minor Victory

Star emerged relatively unscathed from this lawsuit. But it is still dealing with another, much larger, potentially damning attack. In that suit, which began several months ago, shareholders are for suspected money laundering and organized crime.

New South Wales recently completed its inquiry into Star s activity in the state. It found gross examples of negligence and mismanagement on various levels. Although the final verdict of the inquiry won t be known until next month, initial indications are that the company is possibly looking at a suspension of its license.

The misconduct charges led to Star s stock losing over AU$1 billion (US$693.8 million). As a result, shareholders aren t happy and want compensation. Star s stock is currently trading at AU$2.99 (US$2.07), about two-thirds of what it was in October of last year.

Article Sources
GVC Ups Ante Again in Bid for Bwin.party editorial policy.
  1. First Prime Time GOP Debate Has Little Gambling Focus, Even with Trump Center Stage

Compare Accounts
×
Borgata Responds to Ivey Countersuit
Provider
Name
Description
Alabama Citizens Want Vote on Gambling Expansion  Betting on US Presidential Campaign Outcome for 2016: Okay Anywhere Except in America  Alabama Gambling Debate Heats Up Between Governor and Senator  Alabama Gambling Bill Moves Forward as Angry Voices Drowned Out in Senate  Waitress at Rivers Casino Awarded Over $1 Million for Hostile Work Environment  Pennsylvania Online Gambling Not Likely Anytime Soon  Ritz Club London Wins £2 Million Court Case Against Swiss No-Pay High Roller  Revenues Up, Profits Down at IGT Since Merger  666Bet Owner Paul Bell, Metro Play, Forced Into Liquidation  Sands Bethlehem to Add Stadium Seating for Gambling